Duration of ex parte orders
In Re W (Minors) [2016] EWHC 2226 (Fam) Mostyn J was dealing with a final hearing in respect of an application for a
location order. His judgment provides practitioners with guidance in respect of the duration of ex parte orders.
The mother had obtained an ex parte non molestation order which had been made for a period of one year, with provision in the order for it to be considered at a further hearing on a date to be fixed by the court officer on request by the respondent.
Mostyn J clarified that the order clearly flouts the guidance set out by the President in the President's Practice Guidance of 13 October 2014 in which it is made clear that the duration of an ex parte order prior to a review at an inter partes hearing should not normally exceed 14 days and that provision must be made for a specific return date.
Mostyn J draws practitioners' attention to the editorial notes in the Red Book in respect of ex parte orders, which criticises the President's Guidance as unworkable in practice and which reduces the protection for victims.
"It is perhaps unsurprising that this order was made in this form given the terms of the editorial note which prefaces the Guidance as it is printed in the 2016 edition of the Family Court Practice at p.2681. This note, which in my judgment is intemperate, disrespectful and legally wrong, in effect incites the lower judiciary to ignore the Guidance and to continue with the bad practices that the Guidance was intended to eradicate."
An` ex parte order must specify a return date providing for a full inter partes hearing in order to review the hearing as soon as possible.